Institution-Driven Comparative Advantage and Organizational Choice
24 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2012 Last revised: 17 Jul 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Institution-Driven Comparative Advantage and Organizational Choice
Institution-Driven Comparative Advantage and Organizational Choice
Date Written: September 1, 2012
Abstract
The theory of the firm suggests that firms can respond to poor contract enforcement by vertically integrating their production process. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether firms' integration opportunities affect the way contract enforcement institutions determine international trade patterns. We find that the benefits of judicial quality for the exports of contract-intense goods are more muted in industries that have a greater propensity towards vertical integration arrangements with input suppliers. We show that our results are not driven by primitive industry characteristics. Our results confirm the role of judicial quality as source of comparative advantage and suggest that this depends not only on the technological characteristics of the goods produced but also on the way firms are able to organize the production process.
Keywords: International Trade, Comparative Advantage, Contract Enforcement, Vertical Integration
JEL Classification: D23, F10, F14, L22, L23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade
By David L. Hummels, Jun Ishii, ...
-
Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico's Maquiladoras
-
Integration vs. Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium
By Gene M. Grossman and Elhanan Helpman
-
Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure
By Pol Antras
-
The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing: A Profile of Four Countries
-
The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from Four Countries
-
Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?
By Kei-mu Yi