After the Sunset: The Residual Effect of Temporary Legislation

18 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2012 Last revised: 22 Mar 2019

See all articles by Frank Fagan

Frank Fagan

South Texas College of Law Houston; EDHEC Augmented Law Institute

Date Written: August 1, 2013

Abstract

The difference between permanent legislation and temporary legislation is the default rule of termination: permanent legislation governs perpetually, while temporary legislation governs for a limited time. Recent literature on legislative timing rules considers the effect of temporary legislation to stop at the moment of expiration. When the law expires, so does its regulatory effect. This article extends that literature by examining the effect of temporary legislation beyond its expiration. We show that in addition to affecting compliance behavior which depends on statutory enforcement, temporary legislation also affects compliance behavior which does not depend on statutory enforcement, and more generally, organizational behavior after a sunset. When temporary legislation expires therefore, it can continue to administer regulatory and other effects. We specify the conditions for this process and give the optimal legislative response.

Keywords: timing rules, temporary legislation, sunset clauses, statutory obsolescence

JEL Classification: K23, K42

Suggested Citation

Fagan, Frank, After the Sunset: The Residual Effect of Temporary Legislation (August 1, 2013). European Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 36, No. 1, p. 209, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2159546

Frank Fagan (Contact Author)

South Texas College of Law Houston

1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States

EDHEC Augmented Law Institute

Roubaix, 59057
France

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
Abstract Views
732
Rank
439,681
PlumX Metrics