Building a More Effective Global Climate Regime Bottom-Up

32 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2012

See all articles by Richard B. Stewart

Richard B. Stewart

New York University School of Law

Michael Oppenheimer

Princeton University - Princeton School of Public and International Affairs

Bryce Rudyk

New York University (NYU) - Guarini Center on Environmental and Land Use Law

Date Written: March 27, 2012

Abstract

The Durban Platform for Enhanced Action holds out the promise of progress towards a climate treaty that includes greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limitations commitments by all major emitting countries, including developing as well as developed countries. But as the UNFCCC process still faces significant obstacles, it needs to be supplemented, supported and furthered by concerted domestic and international efforts to build from the bottom up, a network of more limited and targeted regulatory and financial arrangements that would promote transnational cooperation, coordination and quantitative progress in reducing net GHG emissions.

This paper focuses on specific transnational arrangements that are regulatory in character, involving standards, protocols, and other norms for products and production and process methods, for investments, financing, and trade, for generating and transmitting information, and other activities relevant to achieving GHG reductions. These transnational programs would focus to a considerable extent on achieving economic or environmental objectives other than climate protection, but in doing so would stimulate behavioral changes and instigate institutional arrangements that produce GHG reductions as a co-benefit. These regimes would involve not only major emitting countries but also firms, sub-national jurisdictions, civil society organizations (CSOs) and international organizations. These latter actors are not part of the UNFCCC process (other than as observers), but often already have significant economic and other non-climate incentives to undertake actions that will reduce GHG, or would readily respond to the deployment of such incentives. The strategy is to complement the universalist state-centered UNFCC process with a suite of concerted initiatives for regulatory and financial cooperation and coordination in specific fields involving non-state as well as state actors, focused on the most promising targets of opportunity for near-term emissions reductions.

Keywords: Climate Change, Bottom-Up Strategies, International Negotiations

Suggested Citation

Stewart, Richard B. and Oppenheimer, Michael and Rudyk, Bryce, Building a More Effective Global Climate Regime Bottom-Up (March 27, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2162756 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2162756

Richard B. Stewart (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
Room 411F
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-992-8165 (Phone)
212-995-4590 (Fax)

Michael Oppenheimer

Princeton University - Princeton School of Public and International Affairs ( email )

Department of Geosciences
Princeton, NJ 08544-1021
United States
+1 609-258-2338 (Phone)

Bryce Rudyk

New York University (NYU) - Guarini Center on Environmental and Land Use Law ( email )

139 MacDougal St.
Wilf Hall 312
New York, NY 10012
United States
(212) 992-8105 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
150
Abstract Views
1,287
Rank
352,966
PlumX Metrics