Epidemiology in the Courtroom: Mixed Messages from Recent British Experience

Law, Probability and Risk 11 (1) 2012, pp. 85-99

Posted: 17 Nov 2012

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

In its first foray into the labyrinth that causation in personal injury has become, the U.K. Supreme Court recently held obiter that statistical evidence alone could not establish causation. But in an earlier toxic tort case, the High Court had relied on epidemiological evidence to identify a cluster of birth defects arising in the vicinity of a contaminated land site. This recent British experience is then discussed within the wider context of the forensic role of ‘naked statistics’.

Keywords: epidemiology, causation, naked statistics

JEL Classification: K32

Suggested Citation

Miller, Chris, Epidemiology in the Courtroom: Mixed Messages from Recent British Experience (2012). Law, Probability and Risk 11 (1) 2012, pp. 85-99, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2174890

Chris Miller (Contact Author)

University of Salford ( email )

United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
258
PlumX Metrics