Bicameralism as a Form of Government (Or: Why Australia and Japan Do Not Have a Parliamentary System)

Parliamentary Affairs, Forthcoming

Posted: 16 Nov 2012

See all articles by Steffen Ganghof

Steffen Ganghof

University of Potsdam, Economics and Social Sciences - Political Science

Date Written: September 18, 2012

Abstract

The article analyses a certain type of bicameralism not merely as a form of legislative organisation, but as a form of government – as a hybrid between parliamentarism and presidentialism. A new typology of pure and hybrid forms of government is proposed, which classifies bicameralism in Australia and Japan as chamber-independent government. This type is systematically compared to other forms of government, including hybrids like semi-presidentialism, elected prime-ministerial government in Israel (from 1996 to 2002) and assembly-independent government in Switzerland. The article highlights how chamber-independent government has the potential to combine different visions of democracy without leading to presidentialization of political parties.

Keywords: bicameralism, executive-legislative relations, parliamentary government, Australia, Japan

Suggested Citation

Ganghof, Steffen, Bicameralism as a Form of Government (Or: Why Australia and Japan Do Not Have a Parliamentary System) (September 18, 2012). Parliamentary Affairs, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2176128

Steffen Ganghof (Contact Author)

University of Potsdam, Economics and Social Sciences - Political Science ( email )

Potsdam
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
765
PlumX Metrics