RICO Enterprises: The Mob and Fraud

80 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2012

See all articles by Pamela Bucy Pierson

Pamela Bucy Pierson

University of Alabama - School of Law

Date Written: June 27, 2012

Abstract

The Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Practice Act (RICO), passed in 1970, is a sprawling and complex statute designed to penetrate organizations and impose liability on those who orchestrate criminal acts but insulate themselves with layers of underlings and bureaucracy. RICO is a crime and also provides a civil cause of action for those whose business or property has been damaged by RICO conduct. For a variety of reasons, criminal RICO has fallen into disfavor. Civil RICO, which is an optimal tool to pursue fraud, has not yet reached its potential. This article explores this phenomenon and provides a roadmap for civil RICO’s appropriate use in fraud cases.

This article makes four points. First, that RICO's “enterprise” requirement fits the typical white collar case well. RICO focuses on those who use an "enterprise" to commit crimes. White collar offenders almost always use an enterprise, as defined by RICO, to do their deeds; they operate through collective endeavors and use the resources of an existing organization.

Second, because of globalization and the Internet, white collar crime is on a grander scale, wreaks greater havoc on economic stability, is easier to commit, and easier to conceal, than ever before. Effective tools are needed to combat the threats posed by white collar crime. Used properly, RICO can be a highly effective tool.

Third, RICO, especially civil RICO, historically has not been used effectively or appropriately to pursue against fraud. Often it is over utilized which has caused courts and the business community to resent RICO. At the same time, RICO has not been used as much as it could be against sophisticated, wide-ranging frauds. RICO should be deployed more often by the private bar and by the government to target sweeping white collar schemes. One reason for RICO's inappropriate use, both its overuse and underuse, is its complexity. RICO's approach to white collar wrongdoing is novel and effective but its terms are abstract and the courts have made a confusing mess of RICO as they have strived to sort out its elements.

Lastly, this article discusses the most confusing aspect of RICO: its enterprise element. Case law on RICO enterprises is jumbled, inconsistent and often, wrong. This article sorts through this tangled web, analyzing existing case law and suggesting which makes sense, and which does not. This article concludes with concrete suggestions for proper analysis of RICO enterprise issues. These suggestions build on established principles of corporate law, and provide a roadmap for straightforward application of RICO even in the most complex situations. Such clarity will help RICO serve as a robust tool against white collar crime.

Keywords: RICO, racketeering, class actions, fraud, white collar crime, white collar practice, pharmaceutical, pharmaceutical fraud, plaintiffs, punitive damages, business fraud, crime, gang prosecutions, organized crime, narcotics prosecutions

Suggested Citation

Pierson, Pamela Bucy, RICO Enterprises: The Mob and Fraud (June 27, 2012). Temple Law Review, Vol. 85, 2013 (Forthcoming), U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2179206, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2179206

Pamela Bucy Pierson (Contact Author)

University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
(205) 348-1139 (Phone)
(205) 348-3917 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
137
Abstract Views
1,095
Rank
381,245
PlumX Metrics