Universalism and Choice of Law

Penn State International Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2005

14 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2015

See all articles by Jay Lawrence Westbrook

Jay Lawrence Westbrook

University of Texas at Austin School of Law

Date Written: January 3, 2004

Abstract

This Article sets forth a basic structure for a choice-of-law analysis in a multinational bankruptcy case. The analysis distinguishes between two distinct, yet often conflated, issues, (1) the law governing a specific claim and (2) the law governing the distribution of the proceeds of the insolvency proceeding. The distinction is critical because the first issue is typically governed by nonbankruptcy law, while the second is governed by bankruptcy law.

Using a recent United States’ case (Lernout) as an example, the Article demonstrates how a court failed to distinguish between these choice of law issues. The failure resulted in the application of United States’ bankruptcy law rather than the bankruptcy law of the debtor’s center of main interests. The Article concludes that courts in universalist bankruptcy jurisdictions, such as the United States, should be committed to a choice of law framework that envisions a unified distribution to creditors through liquidation or reorganization.

Suggested Citation

Westbrook, Jay L., Universalism and Choice of Law (January 3, 2004). Penn State International Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2196226

Jay L. Westbrook (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
(512) 232-1303 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utexas.edu/webra/faculty/jwestbrook

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Abstract Views
701
Rank
315,980
PlumX Metrics