Patent Reform in the United States: Lessons Learned
7 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2013 Last revised: 9 Jan 2013
There are 2 versions of this paper
Patent Reform in the United States: Lessons Learned
Patent Reform in the United States: Lessons Learned
Date Written: January 4, 2013
Abstract
In previous work with Mark Lemley I have discussed the critical role played by the courts in fitting patent law to the ongoing needs of innovation. Careful scrutiny of the recently enacted America Invents Act (AIA), which legislatively reforms American patent law, underscores the need for robust judicial involvement in fostering a healthy patent system. In many instances during the development of the AIA, an initially perceived need for legislative reform was superseded by ameliorative judicial action. In other instances, Congress addressed issues of patent doctrine and procedure that can and should only be addressed by legislative action. But in many respects, the AIA introduces into the statute new lacunae that the courts will now be called upon to resolve. Ironically, legislative reform of patent law has set the stage for decades of fresh judicial interpretation and gap-filling to rehabilitate a statute newly riddled with uncertainty.
Keywords: AIA, patent law, legislation, policy levers, America Invents Act, patent reform
JEL Classification: D71, D72, D73, D78, H41, H42, O31, O33, O34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation