What Does Economics Have to Say about Afghanistan's Future?: Western Economic Naiveté and the Afghanistan Mess

15 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2013 Last revised: 11 Jan 2013

Date Written: January 9, 2013

Abstract

Using three market examples: opium, grapes, and timber; this paper illustrates mismanagement of Afghan economic affairs. These examples show an adverse effect of Western influence since the 9/11 invasion. Economic policy in Afghanistan is based on the history of capitalism, not the principles of economics. This mistake has been catastrophic. The Science of Economics has predictive power in Afghanistan if Afghan beliefs are distinguished from Western beliefs. Once Afghan attitudes are understood, Afghanistan is more easily managed. The greatest economic distinction between the West and Afghanistan is the absence of individual rights, particularly, in economic terms, property rights – in Afghanistan. A focus on self-interests of Afghans, instead of property rights and foreign spending would lead to better economic outcomes in Afghanistan.

Keywords: economics, Afghanistan, market regulation, corruption, property rights, capitalism

JEL Classification: A11, A13, B12, B25, D10, D45, D61, D72, D74, E61, E62, E65, F22

Suggested Citation

Dew, James Kurt, What Does Economics Have to Say about Afghanistan's Future?: Western Economic Naiveté and the Afghanistan Mess (January 9, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2198395 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2198395

James Kurt Dew (Contact Author)

Northeastern University ( email )

360 Huntington Ave,
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
103
Abstract Views
693
Rank
469,855
PlumX Metrics