Through the Janus Looking Glass
Bloomberg/BNA Securities Regulation & Law Report, Vol. 44, No. 22, p. 1074 (May 28, 2012)
10 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2013
Date Written: May 28, 2012
Abstract
Visiting Pace Law School Professor Edward Pekarek and Genavieve Shingle, a third-year law student, writes about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. First Derivative Traders. In the ruling, the justices took a narrow view of primary liability in a private action under 1934 Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b-5.
Keywords: SEC, 10b-5, Janus, Supreme Court, speech, first amendment, libel, Lanham Act, Dodd-Frank, false advertising, securities, DMCA 512, CDA 230, Pekarek
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Pekarek, Edward and Shingle, Genavieve, Through the Janus Looking Glass (May 28, 2012). Bloomberg/BNA Securities Regulation & Law Report, Vol. 44, No. 22, p. 1074 (May 28, 2012), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2199140
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.