The Effect of Options on Coordination
43 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2013
Date Written: January 2013
Abstract
This paper studies how constraints on the timing of actions affect equilibrium in intertemporal coordination problems. We show that while the possibility of waiting longer for others' actions helps agents to coordinate in the good equilibrium, the option of delaying ones' actions harms coordination and can induce severe coordination failures: if agents are very patient, they might get arbitrarily low expected payoffs even in cases where coordination would yield arbitrarily large returns. The risk-dominant equilibrium of the corresponding one-shot game is selected when the option to delay effort is commensurate with the option to wait longer for others' actions. In an application to innovation processes, we show that protection of the domestic industry might hinder industrialization. We also argue that increased competition might have spurred the emergence of shadow banking in the last few decades.
Keywords: coordination failures, delay, option, strategic complementarities
JEL Classification: C72, C73, D84
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo
By Gary B. Gorton and Andrew Metrick
-
Securitization Without Risk Transfer
By Viral V. Acharya, Philipp Schnabl, ...
-
Securitization Without Risk Transfer
By Viral V. Acharya, Philipp Schnabl, ...
-
Securitization Without Risk Transfer
By Viral V. Acharya, Philipp Schnabl, ...
-
Rollover Risk and Market Freezes
By Viral V. Acharya, Douglas M. Gale, ...
-
Rollover Risk and Market Freezes
By Viral V. Acharya, Douglas M. Gale, ...
-
Rollover Risk and Market Freezes
By Viral V. Acharya, Douglas M. Gale, ...
-
Rollover Risk and Market Freezes
By Viral V. Acharya, Douglas M. Gale, ...
-
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny