A Giant with Feet of Clay? The EU's Ability to Develop Capabilities for Civilian Crisis Management

Romanian Journal of European Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2012

18 Pages Posted: 16 Mar 2013

Abstract

Civilian crisis management has long been considered the EU's forte. Recent research however has questioned the EU's claim to this specialization. I will interrogate how the EU has fared in building civilian capabilities for CSDP through a case study of the impact of the Europeanization of CCM norms in one of the newer EU member states - Poland. I investigate the domestic reverberations of an EU-level CCM governance - conceptualized as a vertical diffusion of norms - and a horizontal diffusion in the realms of policy setting, institutional adaptation, as well as in recruitment and training. I hypothesize that the European cognitive constructions and policy designs are the more likely to impact upon Polish security policy the more they resonate with the ideas embedded in the national security identity. Another intervening variable affecting the 'translation' of EU policy into the domestic context is state capacity. Due to weaknesses in the supply side of CCM and the refracting impact of national security identity and state capacity, I find that Europeanization has had a limited impact on the civilian response capability-building in Poland. Europeanization has been shallow, featuring adjustments on the margins rather than the core of the security policy.

Keywords: Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), civilian crisis management (CCM), Europeanization, capability-building, security governance, Polish security/defence policy

Suggested Citation

Domisiewicz, Rafal, A Giant with Feet of Clay? The EU's Ability to Develop Capabilities for Civilian Crisis Management. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2233839

Rafal Domisiewicz (Contact Author)

Polish Foreign Ministry ( email )

Al. J. Ch. Szucha 23
Warsaw, 00-580
Poland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
338
PlumX Metrics