An Explanation of International Differences in Education and Workplace Training
18 Pages Posted: 3 May 2000
Date Written: February 2000
Abstract
We develop a simple search equilibrium model of workplace training and education based on two features. First, investment in education improves job-related learning skills and reduces training costs burdened by firms. Second, firms with vacant skilled job slots can choose between recruitment from the market and training. Compared to Germany and Japan, the US has both a higher inflow rate into unemployment and a higher efficiency of the matching process. While the combined effort of these differences on the share of educated labor is ambiguous, the effect on the percentage of firms undertaking workplace training is to unambiguously reduce it.
JEL Classification: J24, J31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Private Sector Training and its Impact on the Earnings of Young Workers
-
Minimum Wages and Training Revisited
By David Neumark and William Wascher
-
Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the Us Labour Market?
By Dietmar Harhoff and Thomas J. Kane
-
Beyond the Incidence of Training: Evidence from a National Employers Survey
By Lisa M. Lynch and Sandra E. Black