The Path from Regulator to Hunter: The Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion in the Investigation of Physicians at Teaching Hospitals

Posted: 1 Jun 2000

See all articles by Pamela Bucy Pierson

Pamela Bucy Pierson

University of Alabama - School of Law

Abstract

This article examines the economic and cultural disruption that a law enforcement initiative can have on an industry by focusing on a recent federal law enforcement health care fraud initiative, Physicians at Teaching Hospitals ("PATH"). The PATH initiative is an apt case study: it is nation-wide, was undertaken after a deliberative process among multiple federal agencies, and is focused on a limited group of health care providers regarding few legal and reimbursement issues. Part I of the article describes the PATH initiative. Part II examines the arsenal of sanctions available to the government to pursue health care fraud, focusing on the False Claims Act, the statute utilized in the PATH initiative. Part III suggests that because the investigation and prosecution of an industry can be disruptive, care must be taken to ensure that the prosecutive initiative is warranted. The article suggests that pursuit of fraudulent healthcare providers is only one aspect of a functional health care system and that understanding when a systemic regulatory breakdown has occurred is also vital. To the extent that the current emphasis on fraud prosecution has overshadowed correction of systemic problems, the equilibrium should be reset.

Suggested Citation

Pierson, Pamela Bucy, The Path from Regulator to Hunter: The Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion in the Investigation of Physicians at Teaching Hospitals. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=224147

Pamela Bucy Pierson (Contact Author)

University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
(205) 348-1139 (Phone)
(205) 348-3917 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
621
PlumX Metrics