Sterilising Talent: A Critical Assessment of Injunctions Enforcing Negative Covenants

Sydney Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 617-635, 2012

Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/25

20 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2013 Last revised: 27 May 2013

See all articles by Joellen Riley

Joellen Riley

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 3, 2013

Abstract

The law favouring the grant of injunctions to enforce negative covenants in employment contracts is producing mischief and requires review. The author argues that in cases involving the enforcement of post-employment restraints which sterilize the capacity of employees to continue a career, plaintiff employers should be put to the test of proving damages. A number of principles support this view, not the least being that the grant of such injunctions can be punitive, and most certainly anti-competitive. Combined with a general weakening of the doctrine making illegal restraints of trade that go further than is reasonable to protect a legitimate business interest, and a readiness to recognise a ‘stable workforce’ as such an interest, injunctions enforcing restrictive covenants have enabled employers to restrict the career choices even of employees who have not signed such agreements.

Keywords: Employment contracts, restrictive covenants, restraint of trade, equitable injunctions

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K31

Suggested Citation

Riley, Joellen, Sterilising Talent: A Critical Assessment of Injunctions Enforcing Negative Covenants (April 3, 2013). Sydney Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 617-635, 2012, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/25, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2244676

Joellen Riley (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )

New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
+61 2 9351 0205 (Phone)
+61 2 9351 0200 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
516
Rank
524,182
PlumX Metrics