Why Some Cities are Growing and Others Shrinking
20 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2013
Date Written: June 15, 2011
Abstract
Over the last three decades, large cities like Pittsburgh, Detroit, Cleveland, Buffalo, and Toledo have seen their populations shrink, while areas like Houston, Atlanta, Dallas, Tampa, and Phoenix have seen their populations grow rapidly. Examining the policy differences between high-growth and low-growth areas can provide evidence that may help declining cities reverse their fortunes.
This article details that relationship between taxes and growth for the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas. In the 10 highest-tax metro areas, the state and local tax burden accounted for about 12.4 percent of personal income. In those same areas, population grew by 21.3 percent from 1980 to 2007, employment grew by 40.1 percent, and real personal income grew by 75.5 percent. In contrast, taxes were only 8.3 percent of personal income in the 10 lowest-tax areas. The economic growth in those areas was much faster. Population grew by 64.4 percent, employment by 107.6 percent, and real personal income by 157.3 percent.
Keywords: metropolitan policy, population trends, urban policy, city tax rates
JEL Classification: H70, H71, H79
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Growth and Convergence Across the Us: Evidence from County-Level Data
By Matthew John Higgins, Daniel Levy, ...
-
Growth and Convergence Across the U.S.: Evidence from County-Level Data
By Matthew John Higgins, Daniel Levy, ...
-
Examining the Role of Economic Opportunity and Amenities in Explaining Population Redistribution
By Peter R. Mueser and Philip E. Graves
-
Sigma Convergence Versus Beta Convergence: Evidence from U.S. County-Level Data
By Andrew T. Young, Matthew John Higgins, ...
-
The Effects of Two-Year College on the Labor Market and Schooling Experiences of Young Men