Has the Business Cycle Been Abolished?

18 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2000 Last revised: 29 Nov 2022

See all articles by Victor Zarnowitz

Victor Zarnowitz

The Conference Board; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); University of Chicago

Date Written: April 1999

Abstract

Long business expansions have repeatedly generated expectations of self- perpetuating prosperity, yet it is clear that such popular forecasts always proved wrong eventually. Few business cycle peaks are successfully predicted; indeed, most are publicly recognized only with lengty delays. Analysts have been prompter to recognize troughs than peaks, even though the latter have often followed major slowdowns and have much longer (but also more variable variable) leadtimes of the indicators. Oil price boosts and monetary policy shifts triggered some recent cyclical downturns, but even in these particular episodes other more regularly observed developments played major roles. THe insistence on single shocks as the causes of recessions is erroneous: the older emphasis on movements in the growth of demand, money and credit, profits and investment deserve a revival. The relatively new but now widely held belief is that, for the recession-free stability to reign, real growth must be no more than moderate and inflation must stay quiescent but financial asset prices can rise indefinitely. The risk of overheating alone is being emphasized but downside as well as upside risks exist and both need to be continually considered."

Suggested Citation

Zarnowitz, Victor, Has the Business Cycle Been Abolished? (April 1999). NBER Working Paper No. w6367, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=226116

Victor Zarnowitz (Contact Author)

The Conference Board ( email )

845 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
United States
212-339-0432 (Phone)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Chicago

1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States