Bureaucracy, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. Cities During the Progressive Era
24 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2000 Last revised: 5 Aug 2022
Date Written: December 1994
Abstract
Recent work in the sociology of economic development has emphasized the establishment of a professional bureaucracy in place of political appointees as an important component of the institutional environment in which private enterprise can flourish. I hypothesize that establishment of such a bureaucracy will lengthen the period that public decision makers are willing to wait to realize the benefits of expenditures, leading to allocation of a greater proportion of government resources to long-gestation period projects such as infrastructure. This hypothesis can be tested using data generated by a `natural experiment' in the early part of this century, when a wave of municipal reform transformed the governments of many U.S. cities. Controlling for city and time effects, adoption of Civil Service is found to increase the share of total municipal expenditure allocated to road and sewer investment. Other estimates imply that this increased share raises the growth rate of city manufacturing employment by one-half percent per year.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones
-
The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure
By Paolo Mauro
-
The Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth
By Paolo Mauro
-
The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth
By Kevin M. Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth
By Gary S. Becker, Kevin M. Murphy, ...
-
By Robert E. Hall and Charles I. Jones