An Experimental Investigation of Approaches to Audit Decision Making: An Evaluation Using Systems-Mediated Mental Models

Posted: 26 May 2013 Last revised: 27 Jun 2013

See all articles by Amy K. Choy

Amy K. Choy

Independent

Ronald R. King

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 1, 2004

Abstract

The objective of this research is to articulate a decision-making foundation for the systems audit approach. Under this audit approach, the auditor first gains an understanding of the audited economic environment, strategy, and business processes and then forms expectations about its performance and financial reporting. Proponents of this audit approach argue that decision making is enhanced because the knowledge of the system allows the auditor to focus on the most important risks. However, there has not been an explicit framework to explain how systems knowledge can enhance decision making. To provide such a framework, we combine mental model theory with general systems theory to produce a hypothesis we refer to as a systems-mediated mental model hypothesis. We test this hypothesis using experimental economics methods. We find that (1) subjects make systematic errors under the setting without an organizing framework provided by the systems information, and (2) the presence of an organizing framework results in lower reporting errors. Importantly, the organizing framework significantly enhances decision making in the settings where the environment changed. Establishing a decision-making foundation for systems audits can provide an important building block that, in part, can contribute to the development of a more effective and efficient audit technology — an important objective now when audits are facing a credibility crisis.

Keywords: Audit judgement, Mental model theory, Systems audits, Systems theory

Suggested Citation

Choy, Amy K. and King, Ronald R., An Experimental Investigation of Approaches to Audit Decision Making: An Evaluation Using Systems-Mediated Mental Models (June 1, 2004). Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2005, University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-113, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2269155

Ronald R. King

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School ( email )

One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1133
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
United States
314-935-6385 (Phone)
314-935-6359 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
396
PlumX Metrics