Foreseeing the Consequences of Purcell

(2008) Scots Law Times (News) 21-25

4 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2013

See all articles by Michael Plaxton

Michael Plaxton

College of Law, University of Saskatchewan

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

In HM Advocate v Purcell, the High Court of Justiciary clarified the law of murder. The court held that the Crown can prove that an accused acted with "wicked recklessness" only by showing that he "intended to cause physical injury" while "displaying a wicked disregard of fatal consequences." Purcell, by establishing that some form of intention is required in all murder cases, resolves a long running dispute. It also leaves a number of questions unanswered - and may well create new ambiguity in some areas of law previously regarded as settled.

Keywords: Homicide, recklessness

Suggested Citation

Plaxton, Michael, Foreseeing the Consequences of Purcell (2008). (2008) Scots Law Times (News) 21-25, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2272917

Michael Plaxton (Contact Author)

College of Law, University of Saskatchewan ( email )

15 Campus Dr
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N5A6
Canada
3069665894 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
159
Abstract Views
589
Rank
338,922
PlumX Metrics