A Key Influence on the Doctrine of Actual Malice: Justice William Brennan's Judicial Philosophy at Work in Changing the Law of Seditious Libel

9 COMM. L. & POL’Y 567 (2004)

30 Pages Posted: 8 Jun 2013 Last revised: 21 Dec 2013

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

In light of the historical change in the law of seditious libel that New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) prompted and the need for further exploration of the human factors behind the case, this article gives attention to William Brennan’s judicial philosophy at work in the case. The article defines judicial philosophy as a system of guiding principles upon which a judge calls in the process of legal decision-making. Specifically, the article explains how, through Times v. Sullivan, Brennan’s instrumentalist judicial philosophy had an important influence on changing the course of legal protection for criticism of the government in the United States. To advance this central point, the article presents a short history of criticism of the government in the United States before Times v. Sullivan, an overview of Brennan and his judicial philosophy, a summary of Times v. Sullivan, and an application of Brennan’s judicial philosophy to the case.

Keywords: Judicial Philosophy, William Brennan, New York Times v. Sullivan, Seditious Libel

Suggested Citation

Pedrioli, Carlo A., A Key Influence on the Doctrine of Actual Malice: Justice William Brennan's Judicial Philosophy at Work in Changing the Law of Seditious Libel (2004). 9 COMM. L. & POL’Y 567 (2004), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2275700

Carlo A. Pedrioli (Contact Author)

Southern University ( email )

2 Roosevelt Steptoe Dr.
Baton Rouge, LA 70813
United States
225-465-2479 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
441
PlumX Metrics