Room Effects
27 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 2013
Date Written: June 17, 2013
Abstract
We present clean evidence of a direct social context effect on behavior in a laboratory experiment: the gender composition of the room significantly alters the risk decisions of subjects even when the actions or presence of others are neither payoff nor information relevant. Our design is such that subjects do not know the decisions of others, nor can they be inferred. We find that women become more risk taking as the proportion of men in the group increases. This is most consistent with women imitating the expected behavior of others in the session. Our results imply that aggregate behavior is not a simple extrapolation of individual preferences. Groups might have more extreme behavior than the average individual.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Investment
By Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy
-
Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An Experiment
By Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy
-
Myopic Loss Aversion: Information Feedback vs. Investment Flexibility
By Charles Bellemare, Michael U. Krause, ...
-
Does Binding of Feedback Influence Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis
By Martin Weber and Thomas Langer
-
Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach
By Dennis Alexis Valin Dittrich, Werner Güth, ...
-
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations
By Ann-renee Blais and Elke U. Weber
-
Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior
By Matthias Sutter, Martin G. Kocher, ...