Download This PaperBenefit/Flexible/Social Purpose Corporations: Comparison of Principal Features
4 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2013 Last revised: 20 Aug 2013
Date Written: August 2013
Abstract
This chart provides a high-level comparison of the principal features (e.g., purpose, transparency, reporting, voting thresholds, etc.) across three variations of legislation relating to the new corporate forms for conducting social enterprise: legislation proposed by B Lab; legislation enacted by Delaware and Colorado; and legislation enacted in California (flexible purpose) and Washington (social purpose).
Keywords: benefit, flexible, social corporations, social enterprise
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Brewer, Cassady V., Benefit/Flexible/Social Purpose Corporations: Comparison of Principal Features (August 2013). Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2296176 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2296176
Cassady V. Brewer (Contact Author)
Georgia State University - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.