The Question(s) of Political Knowledge: A Temporal-Topical Framework

Posted: 20 Aug 2013

See all articles by Jason Barabas

Jason Barabas

Florida State University

Jennifer Jerit

State University of New York (SUNY), Stony Brook

William M. Pollock

Florida State University

Carlisle Rainey

Texas A&M University

Date Written: August 19, 2013

Abstract

Political knowledge is a central concept in the study of public opinion. Yet what the field collectively believes about this construct is based on dozens of isolated studies using a range of different questions as indicators of political knowledge. Integrating previous work on public opinion, we identify two theoretically relevant dimensions: a temporal dimension that corresponds to when a fact was established and a topical dimension that refers to the content of the question. Combining the two dimensions yields four distinct types of knowledge questions. We illustrate the utility of the temporal-topical framework by showing that several classic findings regarding the predictors of knowledge are conditional upon the type of question being asked. In particular, statistical analyses of more than 300 knowledge questions reveal that education, gender, and the mass media have more nuanced effects than previously thought.

Suggested Citation

Barabas, Jason and Jerit, Jennifer and Pollock, William M. and Rainey, Carlisle, The Question(s) of Political Knowledge: A Temporal-Topical Framework (August 19, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2312633

Jason Barabas

Florida State University ( email )

Tallahasse, FL 32306
United States

Jennifer Jerit (Contact Author)

State University of New York (SUNY), Stony Brook ( email )

Health Science Center

William M. Pollock

Florida State University ( email )

Tallahasse, FL 32306
United States

Carlisle Rainey

Texas A&M University ( email )

201 Allen Building
College Station, TX 77843
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.carlislerainey.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
457
PlumX Metrics