Reconsidering the Role of Election in Rescission

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 32, Issue 3, 2012

U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 655

18 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2013

See all articles by Elise D. Bant

Elise D. Bant

University of Melbourne - Law School

Date Written: August 27, 2013

Abstract

While rescission and restitution are closely related, they are not identical concepts. The election requirement in rescission is a key feature that distinguishes that process from a claim for ‘simple’ restitution. This article considers the election requirement and concludes that it need not be restricted to its contractual operation within the law of unjust enrichment. Election could also play an important role in determining the availability of proprietary restitution for unjust enrichment.

Keywords: common law, property rights, equity, restitution, unjust enrichment, contract law

JEL Classification: K00, K39

Suggested Citation

Bant, Elise D., Reconsidering the Role of Election in Rescission (August 27, 2013). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 32, Issue 3, 2012, U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 655, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2316558

Elise D. Bant (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
540
Rank
527,862
PlumX Metrics