Incentive Compatible Mechanisms for Providing Environmental Public Goods
in Handbook of Experimental Economics and the Environment, eds. J.A. List and M.K. Price (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), 2013, 434-457
36 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2013
Date Written: October 7, 2009
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of two experiments designed to evaluate the applicability of incentive compatible mechanisms such as the pivot mechanism to determine the public’s preferences for environmental public goods. The first experiment employs a variant of the pivot mechanism to determine the appropriate level of a public good that is available in three discrete quantities. Although traditional public goods mechanisms determine the allocation of the good in continuously variable quantities, for many environmental public goods, such as the cleanup of a hazardous waste site, there may be only several discrete options that are feasible. The results indicate that using the pivot mechanism can result in truthful revelation of preferences for the public good, and hence selection of the optimal amount of the program to be implemented. The second experiment compares the ability of real and hypothetical versions of the pivot mechanism and provision point mechanism to generate accurate estimates of the public’s willingness to pay for open space. The results provide mixed evidence of real and hypothetical versions of each mechanism to generate unbiased willingness to pay estimates.
Keywords: Incentive compatible mechanisms, public goods
JEL Classification: C91, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values
By Julie R. Irwin, Paul Slovic, ...
-
Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value
-
Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions
-
Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments
-
Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision
By Christopher K. Hsee, Frank Yu, ...
-
A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
By James J. Murphy, P. Geoffrey Allen, ...
-
Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation
By Christopher K. Hsee and Jiao Zhang
-
Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options