Challenging 'Resistance to Change'
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35 (1), 25-41.
17 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2013 Last revised: 28 Jan 2014
Date Written: September 16, 2013
Abstract
This article examines the origins of one of the most widely accepted mental models that drives organizational behavior: The idea that there is resistance to change and that managers must overcome it. This mental model, held by employees at all levels, interferes with successful change implementation. The authors trace the emergence of the term resistance to change and show how it became received truth. Kurt Lewin introduced the term as a systems concept, as a force affecting managers and employees equally. Because the terminology, but not the context, was carried forward, later uses increasingly cast the problem as a psychological concept, personalizing the issue as employees versus managers. Acceptance of this model confuses an understanding of change dynamics. Letting go of the term — and the model it has come to embody — will make way for more useful models of change dynamics. The authors conclude with a discussion of alternatives to resistance to change.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Complexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation
By Raghu Garud, Joel Gehman, ...
-
Lessons from an Early-Mover: Shale Gas Policy Development in Pennsylvania
-
Fracking Patents: The Emergence of Patents as Information Containment Tools in Shale Drilling
By Daniel R. Cahoy, Joel Gehman, ...
-
Employees Actually Embrace Change: The Chimera of Resistance
By Eric Dent and Edward Powley
-
On the Change and Development in Organizations: A Critical Review of Van De Ven & Poole, 1995
-
By Albert Angehrn and Katrina Maxwell
-
An Analysis of Unconventional Gas Well Reporting under Pennsylvania's Act 13 of 2012
By Joel Gehman, Diego Mastroianni, ...