Safehavenness of Currencies

63 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2013 Last revised: 28 Jul 2022

Date Written: October 10, 2016

Abstract

This working paper was written by Alfred Wong (Hong Kong Monetary Authority) and Tom Fong (Hong Kong Monetary Authority).

This study assesses the ‘safehavenness’ of a number of currencies with a view to providing a better understanding of how capital flows tend to react to sharp increases in global risk aversion during periods of financial crisis. It focuses on how currencies are perceived by dollar-based international investors or, more specifically, whether they are seen as safe-haven or risky currencies. To assess the ‘safehavenness’ of a currency, we use a measure of risk reversal, which is the price difference between a call and put option of a currency. This measures how disproportionately market participants are willing to pay to hedge against appreciation or depreciation of the currency. The relationship between the risk reversal of a currency and global risk aversion is estimated by means of both parametric and non-parametric regressions which allow us to capture the relationship in times of extreme adversity, i.e., tail risk. Our empirical results suggest that the Japanese yen and, to a lesser extent, the Hong Kong dollar are the only safe haven currencies under stressful conditions out of 34 currencies vis-à-vis the US dollar.

Keywords: Safe Haven Currency, Risk Reversal, Quantile Regression, Mixture Vector Autoregressive Models, Tail Risk, Crash Risk

Suggested Citation

Institute for Monetary and Financial Research, Hong Kong, Safehavenness of Currencies (October 10, 2016). Hong Kong Institute for Monetary and Financial Research (HKIMR) Research Paper WP No. 13/2013, Forthcoming in European Journal of Finance, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2330680 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2330680

Hong Kong Institute for Monetary and Financial Research (Contact Author)

(HKIMR) ( email )

Units 1005-1011, 10th Floor, One Pacific Place
88 Queensway
Hong Kong
China

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
112
Abstract Views
1,190
Rank
445,470
PlumX Metrics