The State that Acts Alone: Bully, Good Samaritan or Iconoclast?

Posted: 20 Sep 2000

See all articles by Christine Chinkin

Christine Chinkin

London School of Economics - Law School; University of Michigan Law School

Abstract

The article considers what is understood by the concept of unilateral state action. Through three examples - threatened unilateral sanctions for the cheaper acquisition of medical drugs, Kosovo and East Timor - it examines a range of unilateral acts and suggests that there is no dichotomy between unilateral and multilateral action. Rather the two merge into each other. Many acts are only unilateral in a narrow sense that disregards the disaggregation of the contemporary nation state and what masquerades as collective action or inaction may be manipulated by a state with a particular interest or take on the issue, be dictated by a single strong actor through the threat or use of the veto, or by a single state taking the lead. Such an analysis of unilateral and multilateral acts undermines the task of refining the legal framework. However the article closes with some suggestions with respect to enhancing the transparency and accountability of multilateral decision making.

Suggested Citation

Chinkin, Christine, The State that Acts Alone: Bully, Good Samaritan or Iconoclast?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=233556

Christine Chinkin (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law School ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=cchinkin

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
579
PlumX Metrics