Strategic Voting and Happiness

IEB Working Paper N. 2013/019

24 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2013

See all articles by Francesca Acacia

Francesca Acacia

University of Edinburgh

Maria Cubel

University of Barcelona - Department of Public Finance

Date Written: May 23, 2013

Abstract

In this paper we extend the research on happiness and spatial theory of voting by exploring whether strategic and sincere voting affect subjective well-being. We conduct the analysis with data on a large sample of individuals over 50 elections in 16 OECD countries. The results of the analysis show the existence of a negative effect of strategic voting on subjective well-being. In addition, the likelihood of being satisfied decreases when individuals vote strategically for a political party that wins the electoral race. Furthermore, when we analyse separately left-wing and right-wing voters, we find that the described effect holds for left-wing voters but no for right-wing voters. We discuss this evidence in the light of expressive voting theory (Hilman, 2010) and lack of empathy with future selves (Kahneman and Thaler, 1991). Our results are robust to different measures of strategic voting and subjective well-being.

Keywords: Happiness, life satisfaction, strategic voting, political ideology

JEL Classification: D72, D03, I31

Suggested Citation

Acacia, Francesca and Cubel, Maria, Strategic Voting and Happiness (May 23, 2013). IEB Working Paper N. 2013/019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2341104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2341104

Francesca Acacia

University of Edinburgh ( email )

Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9JY
United Kingdom

Maria Cubel (Contact Author)

University of Barcelona - Department of Public Finance ( email )

Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 585
Barcelona, 08007
Spain

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
728
Rank
658,995
PlumX Metrics