The ‘Ontology of Reading’: Beyond ‘Realism’ and the Problem of Reference Via Eliot and Swinburne

15 Pages Posted: 29 Oct 2013

See all articles by P. G. Monateri

P. G. Monateri

University of Turin - Faculty of Law; SciencesPo, Ecole de Droit

Date Written: October 28, 2013

Abstract

This paper analyses the way in which T. S. Eliot criticized Swinburn's theory to propose a newer theory of language and reading. First of all we can appraise words more as 'views' than as 'sounds', superseding the structuralist approach of De Saussure, and its philosophical applications, to introduce an 'Iconic Turn' into the proper heart of linguistic theory itself. Secondly we may try to introduce a newer concept of 'reading' as 'ontological reading', to bypass the divide between traditional American Close reading and the 'Theory' as it has been introduced by Paul de Man.

Moreover the paper is a first attempt to redefine the problem of reference reframing the same matter of reference.

In this way a direct plunge into literary theory and literariness can bring a new light to the appreciation of their social and political impacts.

Keywords: Literary Theory, Eliot, Swinburn, Poetry, Close Reading, Reference, Language, Linguistics, Human Studies, Interpretation, Poetry, Law and LIterature

JEL Classification: Z00, K40

Suggested Citation

Monateri, Pier Giuseppe and Monateri, Pier Giuseppe, The ‘Ontology of Reading’: Beyond ‘Realism’ and the Problem of Reference Via Eliot and Swinburne (October 28, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2346089 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346089

Pier Giuseppe Monateri (Contact Author)

SciencesPo, Ecole de Droit ( email )

13, Rue de l'Université
Paris
France

HOME PAGE: http://master.sciences-po.fr/droit/en

University of Turin - Faculty of Law ( email )

Via S. Ottavio 20
Torino, 10121
Italy
+39 11 59 14 12 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
990
Rank
420,493
PlumX Metrics