The Messy History of OB&D: How Three Strands Came to Be Seen as One Rope

Management Decision, 40 (3), 266-280

15 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2013 Last revised: 28 Jan 2014

See all articles by Eric Dent

Eric Dent

Florida Gulf Coast University; Florida Gulf Coast University - Lutgert College of Business

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

The George Washington University organizational behavior students have been privileged to learn from professors who were students of three different founders of the field. The three strands discussed here are Roethlisberger and the Harvard Business School, Kurt Lewin and NTL, and Herzberg. This learning experience is very different from introductory text books, which give the impression that the field has made consistent, linear progress from the early days until today. The enriched experience includes a sense of the false starts, values conflicts, egos, lack of cross-communication, and other dimensions of the human condition that played a role in the founding of OB&D. This article reviews the development of these strands and points out that, although there are similarities, they were working on different problems, using different data sources, with different units of analysis. The article concludes with a glimpse at how these three founders would view the field of OB&D today.

Keywords: organizational, behavior, Mesy, History, Ob&D, Strands, progress

Suggested Citation

Dent, Eric, The Messy History of OB&D: How Three Strands Came to Be Seen as One Rope (2002). Management Decision, 40 (3), 266-280, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2348242

Eric Dent (Contact Author)

Florida Gulf Coast University ( email )

10485 FGCU Blvd S
Ft. Myers, FL 33965-6565
United States

Florida Gulf Coast University - Lutgert College of Business ( email )

10485 FGCU Blvd S
Fort Myers, FL
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
394
Abstract Views
1,216
Rank
137,476
PlumX Metrics