Regulatory-Compliant Derivatives Pricing Is Not Risk-Neutral

Risk (Sept 2014)

12 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2013 Last revised: 13 Aug 2014

See all articles by Chris Kenyon

Chris Kenyon

MUFG Securities EMEA plc; University College London

Andrew David Green

Scotiabank

Date Written: August 1, 2014

Abstract

Regulations impose idiosyncratic capital and funding costs for holding derivatives. Capital requirements are costly because derivatives desks are risky businesses; funding is costly in part because regulations increase the minimum funding tenor. Idiosyncratic costs mean no single measure makes derivatives martingales for all market participants. Hence Regulatory-compliant pricing is not risk-neutral. This has implications for exit prices and mark-to-market.

Keywords: Risk-neutral pricing, Regulators, regulations, FVA, CVA, capital, incomplete markets

JEL Classification: D40, D52, D81, E61, G12, G13, G14, G15, G18, G21, G28, K23, L51, M41, M20

Suggested Citation

Kenyon, Chris and Green, Andrew David, Regulatory-Compliant Derivatives Pricing Is Not Risk-Neutral (August 1, 2014). Risk (Sept 2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2349103 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349103

Chris Kenyon (Contact Author)

MUFG Securities EMEA plc ( email )

25 Ropemaker St
London, EC2Y 9AJ
United Kingdom

University College London ( email )

Gower Street
London, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Andrew David Green

Scotiabank ( email )

201 Bishopsgate
London, London EC2M 3NS
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
200
Abstract Views
1,151
Rank
276,885
PlumX Metrics