Review of Prigg v. Pennsylvania: Slavery, the Supreme Court, and the Ambivalent Constitution

Law Library Journal, Vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 540-42 (2013)

Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-41

4 Pages Posted: 14 Nov 2013 Last revised: 12 Dec 2013

See all articles by Susan deMaine

Susan deMaine

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Date Written: November 1, 2013

Abstract

In 1842, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Prigg v. Pennsylvania, resolving a dispute about fugitive slave rendition that had raged between the states for decades. H. Robert Baker’s analysis of the decision and the events that led up to it is the first book-length work to investigate Prigg and its place in American history. Baker traces the development of fugitive slave laws and recounts the heart-wrenching story that lies behind Prigg to shed light on the Supreme Court’s decision and the gradual clarification of American federalism. This review explores Baker's coverage of the human and legal stories at stake in the Prigg decision.

Keywords: slavery, fugitive salve, federalism, Supreme Court, book review

Suggested Citation

deMaine, Susan, Review of Prigg v. Pennsylvania: Slavery, the Supreme Court, and the Ambivalent Constitution (November 1, 2013). Law Library Journal, Vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 540-42 (2013), Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-41, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2353608

Susan DeMaine (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
843
Rank
509,542
PlumX Metrics