Prevalence of User Innovation in the EU: Analysis Based on the Innobarometer Surveys of 2007 and 2009

15. Flowers, S., Sinozic, T., and Patel, P. (2009) Prevalence of User Innovation in the EU: Analysis based on the Innobarometer Surveys of 2007 and 2009. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper, EU, Brussels: pp27

27 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2013

See all articles by Stephen H. Flowers

Stephen H. Flowers

University of Brighton - Centre for Research in Innovation Management (CENTRIM)

Tanja Sinozic

Institute of Technology Assessment, ÖAW

Parimal Patel

University of Sussex - The Freeman Centre

Date Written: September 18, 2009

Abstract

Users play an important part in innovation processes and outputs. Both firms and consumers have needs that must be understood for a product to stand any chance of success. They also possess expertise that is potentially valuable for product development. Users may even modify existing products or develop new ones in response to their own needs, possibly anticipating future market demand in the process. However, despite a large body of literature exploring these and other aspects of user involvement in innovation, we still know relatively little about the scale and importance of these activities. This study is the first to explore user innovation amongst a large sample of European firms engaged in innovative activities. It provides new insights into the ways in which European firms innovate and how they engage with their user populations.

The report draws on the results of the 2007 and the 2009 Innobarometer surveys to systematically address two inter-related sets of questions:

• How prevalent is user innovation amongst a large sample of innovating firms in the EU?

• How are firms engaged in user innovation different from the whole population of innovating firms?

One of the major contributions of this study is that it explores three different forms of user innovation: User Process Innovation, User Product Innovation, and User Involvers. Much of the conventional literature on firm-level user innovation has focused on process innovations that arise when firms modify existing technologies or create new technologies for their own use. In this study two other categories of firms are included: those that innovate by improving already existing products and those that involve users in their innovative activities.

The findings show that a substantial minority of innovative firms in the EU are involved in process and product modification (around 30%), and more than half such firms involve users in support of their innovative activities. User innovation is also more or less evenly spread across industrial sectors and across EU countries.

Large firms are more likely to be involved in all forms of user innovation than small firms. For example 39% of all innovative firms with more than 500 employees are User Process Innovators, and in the case of User Involvers this rises to 61%.

A clear message from the analysis undertaken in this report is that firms engaged in user innovation can be classed as “super-innovators”. Compared to other innovative firms, they are more likely to introduce new products, processes or services. They are also more likely to initiate new organizational methods. Moreover a higher proportion of user innovators carry out both intra and extra mural R&D and apply for patents.

The main internal sources of ideas for user innovators are management and production engineers and technicians. Externally the most important source of information, advice or support to help customize or modify comes from the original developer or supplier of these products.

These findings raise a series of issues for the future measurement of this form of innovative activity and the policies that may be developed for its support. A number of promising new directions for future research also emerge from the findings.

Suggested Citation

Flowers, Stephen H. and Sinozic, Tanja and Patel, Parimal, Prevalence of User Innovation in the EU: Analysis Based on the Innobarometer Surveys of 2007 and 2009 (September 18, 2009). 15. Flowers, S., Sinozic, T., and Patel, P. (2009) Prevalence of User Innovation in the EU: Analysis based on the Innobarometer Surveys of 2007 and 2009. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper, EU, Brussels: pp27, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2356247

Stephen H. Flowers (Contact Author)

University of Brighton - Centre for Research in Innovation Management (CENTRIM) ( email )

F102 Friston House
Village Way
Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH, E. Sussex BN 1 9PH
United Kingdom

Tanja Sinozic

Institute of Technology Assessment, ÖAW ( email )

Strohgasse 45/5
Wien, A-1030
Austria

Parimal Patel

University of Sussex - The Freeman Centre ( email )

Sussex House
Falmer
Brighton, Sussex BNI 9RH
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
971
Rank
551,552
PlumX Metrics