Constraining Arrest for Breach of the Peace

5 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2014 Last revised: 21 Sep 2017

See all articles by A. T. H. Smith

A. T. H. Smith

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law; University of Cambridge

Date Written: 2000

Abstract

Given that it was no more than a decision of the Divisional Court, and a pre-War decision at that, the case of Duncan v. Jones [1936] 1 K.B. 218 has exercised a remarkably enduring influence. The case appeared to give the police enormous operational discretion in dealing with actual and prospective breaches of the peace. When a constable reasonably apprehended a breach of the peace, he could take steps (arguably, only reasonable steps) to prevent it or its recurrence. This disarmingly simple formula made it very difficult to challenge, let alone control, the way in which the police exercised their powers.

Keywords: Duncan v Jones, breach of the peace, obstruction, freedom of speech

JEL Classification: K1, K14

Suggested Citation

Smith, A. T. H., Constraining Arrest for Breach of the Peace (2000). (2000) 59 Cambridge Law Journal at 421, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 123/2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2390861

A. T. H. Smith (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

University of Cambridge ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
460
Rank
627,771
PlumX Metrics