Mutual Assent, Normative Degradation and Mass Market Standard Form Contracts -- A Critique of Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights and the Rule of Law, Part I

86 Pages Posted: 16 Feb 2014 Last revised: 23 Feb 2014

Date Written: February 14, 2014

Abstract

Analyzing a difficult subject that pervades contract law and which is vital to the national economy, many scholars have written about boilerplate contracts. With her 2013 book, Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights And The Rule Of Law, Professor Margaret Jane Radin weighs in on the discussion, rejecting utilitarian-welfare notions that economic efficiency can justify the extensive use of mass market boilerplate.

In her main contention, Radin argues that mass market standard form contracts improperly degrade consumer rights in the area of voluntary consent (herein “normative degradation”). I respectfully suggest that the book has problems on both doctrinal and normative grounds. In my Article, I summarize the author’s argument on normative degradation, identify my concerns, and propose an alternative formulation.

Please be advised that the article is not in its final form and that quotations taken from it may not be identical to the work ultimately appearing in the Cleveland State Law Review.

Keywords: Boilerplate, Adhesion Contracts, Mutual Assent, Meeting of the Minds

JEL Classification: K12

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Steven, Mutual Assent, Normative Degradation and Mass Market Standard Form Contracts -- A Critique of Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights and the Rule of Law, Part I (February 14, 2014). Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2396161

Steven Feldman (Contact Author)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( email )

Huntsville, AL
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
958
Rank
509,542
PlumX Metrics