Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking Versus Random Assignment

45 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

See all articles by Robert Garlick

Robert Garlick

Duke University - Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 1, 2014

Abstract

This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school graduation examinations. Random assignment creates dormitories that are approximately representative of the population of students. Tracking lowers students' mean grades in their first year of university and increases the variance or inequality of grades. This result is driven by a large negative effect of tracking on low-scoring students' grades and a near-zero effect on high-scoring students' grades. Low-scoring students are more sensitive to changes in their peer group composition and their grades suffer if they live only with low-scoring peers. In this setting, residential tracking has undesirable efficiency (lower mean) and equity (higher variance) effects. The result isolates a pure peer effect of tracking, whereas classroom tracking studies identify a combination of peer effects and differences in teacher behavior across tracked and untracked classrooms. The negative pure peer effect of residential tracking suggests that classroom tracking may also have negative effects unless teachers are more effective in homogeneous classrooms. Random variation in peer group composition under random dormitory assignment also generates peer effects. Living with higher-scoring peers increases students' grades and the effect is larger for low-scoring students. This is consistent with the aggregate effects of tracking relative to random assignment. However, using peer effects estimated in randomly assigned groups to predict outcomes in tracked groups yields unreliable predictions. This illustrates a more general risk that peer effects estimated under one peer group assignment policy provide limited information about how peer effects might work with a different peer group assignment policy.

Keywords: Tertiary Education, Secondary Education, Teaching and Learning, Primary Education, Educational Sciences

Suggested Citation

Garlick, Robert, Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking Versus Random Assignment (February 1, 2014). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6787, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404637

Robert Garlick (Contact Author)

Duke University - Department of Economics ( email )

213 Social Sciences Building
Box 90097
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
645
Rank
346,300
PlumX Metrics