Liberal Legal Norms Meet Collective Criminality

18 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2014

See all articles by John D. Ciorciari

John D. Ciorciari

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Global & International Studies

Date Written: February 8, 2011

Abstract

One of the key challenges for mass crimes proceedings is to reconcile the inherently collective nature of large-scale atrocities with liberal due process norms that mandate a focus on individual culpability. Trials typically concentrate on a select number of accused persons, which to some extent obscures the truth about how repressive states or organizations functioned in practice. The role of functionaries and bystanders, who are often spared prosecution or granted formal amnesty, is often largely overlooked. This article reviews the book "Making Sense of Mass Atrocity" by Mark Osiel, discusses the tensions inherent in conducting individual trials for systemic abuses, and examines and critiques Osiel's proposals for ways to reconcile those tensions in international legal doctrine and practice.

Keywords: International criminal law, atrocities, amnesty, prosecution

Suggested Citation

Ciorciari, John D., Liberal Legal Norms Meet Collective Criminality (February 8, 2011). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, No. 6, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2408680

John D. Ciorciari (Contact Author)

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Global & International Studies ( email )

Bloomington, IN
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
44
Abstract Views
313
PlumX Metrics