Discrimination and the Effects of Drug Testing on Black Employment

49 Pages Posted: 6 May 2014 Last revised: 29 May 2023

See all articles by Abigail Wozniak

Abigail Wozniak

Federal Reserve Banks - Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 2014

Abstract

Nearly half of U.S. employers test job applicants and workers for drugs. A common assumption is that the rise of drug testing must have had negative consequences for black employment. However, the rise of employer drug testing may have benefited African-Americans by enabling non-using blacks to prove their status to employers. I use variation in the timing and nature of drug testing regulation to identify the impacts of testing on black hiring. Black employment in the testing sector is suppressed in the absence of testing, a finding which is consistent with ex ante discrimination on the basis of drug use perceptions. Adoption of pro-testing legislation increases black employment in the testing sector by 7-30% and relative wages by 1.4-13.0%, with the largest shifts among low skilled black men. Results further suggest that employers substitute white women for blacks in the absence of testing.

Suggested Citation

Wozniak, Abigail, Discrimination and the Effects of Drug Testing on Black Employment (May 2014). NBER Working Paper No. w20095, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2432837

Abigail Wozniak (Contact Author)

Federal Reserve Banks - Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis ( email )

90 Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55480
United States

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
495
PlumX Metrics