The Politics of Individualization

19 Pages Posted: 22 May 2014 Last revised: 19 Sep 2014

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

Claims are being made that politics is becoming increasingly 'individualised'. By this, some writers are suggesting that both the mode and levels of of political participation are changing. Whilst this paper does not reject the 'individualization thesis', it does seek to contextualise and challenge this to some extent. First, the paper argues that the empirical base for the individualization thesis is, at best, mixed. The paper surveys some key participation indicators in Britain and Australia. This problem is compounded by the proponents of individualisation, such as Ulrich Beck, who do not provide sufficient clues as to the appropriate indicators. Second, traditional typologies of participation can be used to lend support for the individualization thesis, but they risk simplifying our understanding of what is individualised and what is collectivised.

Keywords: political participation, individualization, civic culture

Suggested Citation

Manwaring, Rob, The Politics of Individualization (2014). The Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Sydney Paper​, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2440392 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440392

Rob Manwaring (Contact Author)

Flinders University ( email )

GPO Box 2100
Adelaide S.A. 5001, 5063
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
Abstract Views
754
Rank
435,891
PlumX Metrics