Judicious Encouragement in the Court of Final Appeal: Nothing New?

Hong Kong Law Journal (2013) Vol. 43 No. 2. 421-434

Posted: 9 Jul 2014

See all articles by Anne Scully-Hill

Anne Scully-Hill

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: August 30, 2013

Abstract

The Court of Final Appeal in KEWS v NCHC had to decide whether an award of ancillary relief may be shaped so as to “judiciously encourage” third parties to use their resources to financially support the party “paying” the ancillary relief. The Court of Final Appeal decided that it can take third party resources into account if the previous extent and likely continuation of access to those resources can be satisfactorily determined. Moreover, the Court held this was a reiteration of past practice under the statutory discretion conferred by s 7(1)(a) of the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance and not the development of a discrete principle of judicious encouragement. Nonetheless, a review of past precedents demonstrates that, whilst the court acted within the scope of its statutory discretion, an order so heavily reliant on third party assets deriving neither from a trust nor from a family company is not commonplace. As a consequence of the Court’s decision, intending spouses may in future place greater reliance on marital property agreements in an attempt to exclude third party resources from the Court’s consideration.

Keywords: Family law, divorce, ancillary relief, judicious encouragement

JEL Classification: K19, K10, K30

Suggested Citation

Scully-Hill, Anne, Judicious Encouragement in the Court of Final Appeal: Nothing New? (August 30, 2013). Hong Kong Law Journal (2013) Vol. 43 No. 2. 421-434, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2463986

Anne Scully-Hill (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Kowloon, Sha Tin
Hong Kong

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
511
PlumX Metrics