Cinq décisions rendues en 2013 en droit de la concurrence (Five Canadian Competition Law Decisions of Note Rendered in 2013)
(2014) 26:2 CPI 523
30 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2014
Date Written: May 1, 2014
Abstract
French Abstract: Notre chronique vise à présenter de façon très succincte les cinq décisions qui ont le plus attiré notre attention dans le domaine du droit de la concurrence en 2013: la triologie rendue par la Cour supreme du Canada en matière de recours collectif (Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd c Microsoft Corporation, Sun-Rype Products Ltd c Archer Daniels Midland Company et Infineon Technologies AG c Option Consommateurs), Canada (Commissaire de la concurrence) c Chatr Wireless Inc, Boulangerie Canada Bread ltée c Boulangerie St-Méthode Inc, Tervita Corp c Canada (Commissaire de la concurrence) and R c Pétroles Global Inc.
English Abstract: In this article, we briefly comment on five court decisions rendered in 2013 we see as significant for Canadian competition law: the class action trilogy rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada (Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd v Microsoft Corporation, Sun-Rype Products Ltd v Archer Daniels Midland Company and Infineon Technologies AG v Option Consommateurs), Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v Chatr Wireless Inc, Boulangerie Canada Bread ltée v Boulangerie St-Méthode Inc, Tervita Corp v Canada (Commissioner of Competition) and R v Pétroles Global Inc.
Note: Downloadable document is in French.
Keywords: competition law, Canada, case comment, class action, merger, unfair competition, price-fixing, misleading advertising, organizational criminal liability
JEL Classification: K21, K40, K41, K42, L40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation