Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Perspective of Retail Store Loyalty: Insights from a National Study of Households

40 Pages Posted: 26 Sep 2014

See all articles by Erin Cavusgil

Erin Cavusgil

University of Michigan at Flint

Daekwan Kim

Florida State University - Department of Marketing

Date Written: September 24, 2014

Abstract

Retailers are currently facing an ultra-competitive environment as consumers are foregoing 'brick-and-mortar' stores in favor of shopping online, taking advantage of discounts offered by Internet retailers. Retailers, in turn, are continually exploring how to increase patronage and spending in their stores. Developing loyalty among consumers is critical in today's competitive environment. Building on the hedonic-utilitarian theory, the present study examines the determinants of household retail store loyalty using national consumer panel data over a four-year period. Specifically, this study delineates two categories of retail stores: hedonic retail stores and utilitarian retail stores. We conceive of hedonic consumption as shopping for pleasure and enjoyment, whereas utilitarian consumption occurs when consumers wish to fulfill a specific need or task. Our findings reveal that household store loyalty does in fact exhibit meaningful differences between hedonic retail stores vs. utilitarian retail stores. We offer potential strategies for both hedonic and utilitarian retail stores.

Suggested Citation

Cavusgil, Erin and Kim, Daekwan, Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Perspective of Retail Store Loyalty: Insights from a National Study of Households (September 24, 2014). Kilts Center for Marketing at Chicago Booth – Nielsen Dataset Paper Series 1-020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2501070 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2501070

Erin Cavusgil (Contact Author)

University of Michigan at Flint ( email )

Flint, MI 48502
United States

Daekwan Kim

Florida State University - Department of Marketing ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
472
Abstract Views
2,153
Rank
112,441
PlumX Metrics