The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Transubstantive Rules of State Responsibility

in THE IRAN UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE LAW OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY 109-184 (Richard B. Lillich & Daniel B. Magraw, eds., 1998)

76 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2014

See all articles by David D. Caron

David D. Caron

King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law (deceased); University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (deceased)

Date Written: October 7, 2014

Abstract

This chapter examines the significance of the work of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal ("Tribunal") for secondary rules of State Responsibility that apply regardless of the specific norm (primary rule) allegedly breached, what I will term "trans-substantive" rules or principles. Practically speaking, such an examination entails the analysis of the jurisprudence of the Tribunal as regards attribution because it is primarily this trans-substantive set of rules that the Tribunal was led to address.

Suggested Citation

Caron, David D., The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Transubstantive Rules of State Responsibility (October 7, 2014). in THE IRAN UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE LAW OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY 109-184 (Richard B. Lillich & Daniel B. Magraw, eds., 1998), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2506535

David D. Caron (Contact Author)

King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law (deceased)

University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (deceased)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
398
Abstract Views
1,384
Rank
135,981
PlumX Metrics