A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Market and Book Values

32 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2001

See all articles by Jan Bartholdy

Jan Bartholdy

University of Aarhus - Aarhus School of Business - Department of Business Studies

Paula Peare

Aarhus University - Department of Finance

Roger J. Willett

Victoria University of Wellington - Te Herenga Waka - Victoria Business School

Date Written: November 21, 2000

Abstract

Practitioners and academics often use book values instead of market values when market data is not available. This is appropriate only if market values and book values are related. In this paper a theoretical model of the relationship between market values and book values is developed and this model is tested directly using time-series analysis. The results obtained suggest that although market values and book values may differ in the short run there is a linear relationship between them in the long run. However a simple dynamic forecast of the model suggests that it could take more than 10 years for the two series to approach each other after a shock to one or both of the series. That is, the long run may be too long to be of any practical use.

Keywords: Market values, book values, co-integration, Ohlsons model

JEL Classification: M41, G12

Suggested Citation

Bartholdy, Jan and Peare, Paula and Willett, Roger J., A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Market and Book Values (November 21, 2000). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=250879 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.250879

Jan Bartholdy (Contact Author)

University of Aarhus - Aarhus School of Business - Department of Business Studies ( email )

Fuglesangs Alle 4
DK-8210 Aarhus
Denmark
+4589486338 (Phone)
+4586151943 (Fax)

Paula Peare

Aarhus University - Department of Finance ( email )

Fuglesangs Alle 4
DK-8210 Aarhus
Denmark

Roger J. Willett

Victoria University of Wellington - Te Herenga Waka - Victoria Business School ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington 6140
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
894
Abstract Views
4,063
Rank
49,594
PlumX Metrics