Comparing Alternative Explanations for Accounting Risk-Return Relations

Posted: 8 Jan 2001

See all articles by David L. Deephouse

David L. Deephouse

Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta

Robert M. Wiseman

Michigan State University - Department of Management

Abstract

Research into accounting risk-return relations largely relied on reference-based models of managerial choice. This focus ignores other explanations that may contribute to our understanding. Our study extends prior research by incorporating agency theory and implicit contracts theory into models based on the behavioral theory of the firm. We test our hypotheses in a large sample of US manufacturing firms in two different economic environments. Our results show some support for each theory, suggesting that multiple frameworks may better explain risk-return relations. Further, differences in results between the two economic environments imply that macroeconomic conditions may be important.

Keywords: Risk-return; Behavioral theory of the firm; Agency theory; Implicit contracts theory

JEL Classification: D81

Suggested Citation

Deephouse, David L. and Wiseman, Robert M., Comparing Alternative Explanations for Accounting Risk-Return Relations. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=251383

David L. Deephouse

Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6
Canada
780 492-5419 (Phone)
780 492-3325 (Fax)

Robert M. Wiseman (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - Department of Management ( email )

North Business Complex
East Lansing, MI 48824-1122
United States
517-432-3508 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,507
PlumX Metrics