In Praise of Tents: Regulatory Studies and Transformative Social Science

Posted: 5 Nov 2014

See all articles by John Braithwaite

John Braithwaite

School of Regulation & Global Governance (RegNet)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 2014

Abstract

What are the virtues of institutions we take for granted - universities, the study of the social sciences and humanities, and scholarship on professions such as law? What are the vices of the disciplinary structure of the social sciences, even in the law and society movement and criminology that started as interdisciplinary projects? Research on regulation within an interdisciplinary structure, the Regulatory Institutions Network, is used to illustrate the difficulties of attempts to change direction in the social sciences. The article advocates the creative destruction of disciplinary structures by organizing in tents that study institutionalization (rather than buildings that study categories of institutions). To keep pace with social change, pulling tents down and endlessly pegging out new ones is a path forward. A politics of defending universities and opposing the disciplines that have captured them does not mean advocacy of restructuring. If more interesting work issues from poorly funded tents than from disciplinary edifices, reformers can advance creative destruction.

Suggested Citation

Braithwaite, John, In Praise of Tents: Regulatory Studies and Transformative Social Science (November 2014). Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 10, pp. 1-17, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2519023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030540

John Braithwaite (Contact Author)

School of Regulation & Global Governance (RegNet) ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
309
PlumX Metrics