'East Is East, and West Is West?' Reimagining Asian Exceptionalism and the Study of Democratization

Government and Opposition Journal, 2014

Posted: 8 Nov 2014 Last revised: 7 Dec 2015

Date Written: November 6, 2014

Abstract

The rich country-specific inquiries of Asian studies built a large stock of information that magnifies the exceptionalism of Asia’s experiences (see also Acharya 2001). This contrasts against systematic treatments of the large- and medium-N varieties associated with disciplinary emphasis on theory-building and empirical predictions in comparative studies. Of course, theory-building is not fundamentally at odds with information-gathering and vice versa. Yet, a successful mediation between theory-building of comparative studies on the one hand, and focused small-n or country-specific Asian scholarship on the other, remains the exception rather than the rule. Instead, tensions dog Asian studies regarding what and how to front scholarship – as part of theory-building exercises versus underlining and differentiating Asian studies – to the latter’s detriment as its “noticeable inhospitable”-ness to theory-building increasingly sidelines its scholarship.

Keywords: Asia, rational-choice, theory-building, democratization

Suggested Citation

Yap, O. Fiona, 'East Is East, and West Is West?' Reimagining Asian Exceptionalism and the Study of Democratization (November 6, 2014). Government and Opposition Journal, 2014 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2520314

O. Fiona Yap (Contact Author)

The University of Adelaide ( email )

Adelaide, 5005
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
259
PlumX Metrics