Growth and Trade: The North Can Lose

Posted: 23 Jan 2001

See all articles by Antonio Spilimbergo

Antonio Spilimbergo

International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - The William Davidson Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Several models on growth and trade conclude that a country grows more when trading with a less developed country. This paper shows that this conclusion depends crucially on the assumptions of homothetic preferences and/or having just two goods with respect to learning-by-doing. The paper presents a model where the more advanced country (North) can be worse off after trading with a less developed country (South) because the demand pattern of the South is biased towards Northern products with less learning-by-doing potential. Trade can worsen the welfare if the South is large with respect to the North and/or the preference for low technology goods is high; a necessary condition is the presence of nonhomotheticity of preferences and that the North exports at least two types of goods. In this context, the paper studies the welfare of North and South, separating the static from the dynamic gains from trade.

Keywords: non-homothetic demand learning-by-doing

JEL Classification: O41, F15

Suggested Citation

Spilimbergo, Antonio, Growth and Trade: The North Can Lose. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=252862

Antonio Spilimbergo (Contact Author)

International Monetary Fund (IMF) - Research Department ( email )

700 19th Street NW
Washington, DC 20431
United States
202-623-6346 (Phone)
202-623-6336 (Fax)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - The William Davidson Institute ( email )

724 E. University Ave.
Wyly Hall
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
797
PlumX Metrics